Effective Scrum Practices and Common Mistakes
Effective Scrum Practices and Common Mistakes
In Agile Scrum methodology, each team member has specific roles and
responsibilities that contribute to the success of the sprint. Here's a
detailed look at the activities, the teams responsible for them, common
mistakes, and potential points of disagreement between team members.
1. Sprint Prioritization
Responsible Team Member: Product Owner (PO)
Examples:
1. Identifying User Stories - Selecting the most valuable and urgent
user stories for the upcoming sprint.
2. Setting Priorities - Ranking the stories based on business value and
urgency.
3. Clarifying Requirements - Ensuring that all stories are well-defined
and understood by the team.
Common Mistakes:
1. Ignoring Stakeholder Input - Not considering the needs and feedback
from stakeholders, leading to misaligned priorities.
2. Lack of Clarity - Selecting stories that are not well-defined,
leading to confusion and delays.
3. Overloading the Sprint - Prioritizing too many stories, resulting in
an unrealistic workload for the team.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers may disagree with the PO on the feasibility of the
prioritized stories within the sprint.
2. Stakeholders might feel their needs are not adequately represented in
the prioritized list.
3. QA may argue that certain stories need more definition before they
can be included.
2. Grooming
Responsible Team Member: Business Analyst (BA)/Project Manager (PM)
Examples:
1. Detailing User Stories - Refining user stories with clear acceptance
criteria.
2. Story Sizing - Breaking down large stories into smaller, manageable
tasks.
3. Backlog Refinement - Regularly updating and organizing the product
backlog.
Common Mistakes:
1. Incomplete Stories - Failing to provide all necessary details,
causing misinterpretation.
2. Infrequent Grooming - Not performing grooming sessions regularly,
leading to an unmanageable backlog.
3. Poor Estimation - Incorrectly estimating story sizes, which impacts
sprint planning and delivery.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers may dispute the sizing of stories, believing they are
underestimated.
2. The PO might argue that certain stories are still not well-defined
enough to proceed.
3. QA could feel that the acceptance criteria are not comprehensive
enough to ensure quality.
3. Sprint Planning and Capacity
Responsible Team Member: Scrum Master
Examples:
1. Team Capacity Assessment - Evaluating the team's availability and
workload for the sprint.
2. Task Allocation - Distributing tasks among team members based on
their capacity.
3. Sprint Backlog Creation - Forming a sprint backlog that aligns with the
team's capacity.
Common Mistakes:
1. Ignoring Capacity Limits - Overestimating the team's capacity,
resulting in burnout and missed deadlines.
2. Unclear Objectives - Not setting clear goals for the sprint, leading
to a lack of focus.
3. Unbalanced Workload - Distributing tasks unevenly, causing some team
members to be overburdened while others are underutilized.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers might disagree with the Scrum Master’s assessment of their
capacity.
2. The PO may feel that the sprint backlog does not adequately address
the most critical business needs.
3. Team members might argue about the fairness of task allocation.
4. Sprint Goal
Responsible Team Member: Product Owner (PO)
Examples:
1. Defining Objectives - Setting a clear and achievable goal for the
sprint.
2. Aligning with Business Goals - Ensuring the sprint goal supports the
broader business objectives.
3. Communicating the Goal - Clearly conveying the sprint goal to the
entire team.
Common Mistakes:
1. Vague Goals - Setting ambiguous or broad goals that are hard to
measure.
2. Changing Goals - Altering the sprint goal mid-sprint, causing
confusion and rework.
3. Unrealistic Goals - Setting goals that are too ambitious, leading to
incomplete sprints.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers might feel that the sprint goal is too ambitious or not
feasible within the timeframe.
2. QA could argue that the goal does not adequately consider the time
needed for thorough testing.
3. Stakeholders may believe that the goal does not align well with their
immediate needs.
5. Daily Scrum Meetings
Responsible Team Member: Scrum Team
Examples:
1. Status Updates - Each team member shares their progress, plans for
the day, and any blockers.
2. Identifying Impediments - Highlighting obstacles that need to be
addressed.
3. Collaboration - Encouraging team members to help each other overcome
challenges.
Common Mistakes:
1. Long Meetings - Allowing daily scrums to exceed the recommended
15-minute duration.
2. Off-Topic Discussions - Straying from the agenda, leading to
unproductive meetings.
3. Lack of Participation - Team members not actively participating or
engaging in the discussions.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Some team members may feel the meeting takes too long, cutting into
productive work time.
2. There may be disagreements on the priority and handling of identified
impediments.
3. Certain members might feel that others are not providing enough
detail in their updates.
6. QA Test Cases
Responsible Team Member: QA
Examples:
1. Creating Test Cases - Developing comprehensive test cases based on
user stories.
2. Test Case Execution - Running test cases to verify functionality.
3. Bug Reporting - Documenting any defects or issues found during testing.
Common Mistakes:
1. Incomplete Test Coverage - Missing important test scenarios, leading
to undetected bugs.
2. Poor Documentation - Not providing detailed test case documentation,
making it hard to reproduce issues.
3. Delayed Testing - Starting testing late in the sprint, reducing time
for fixing bugs.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers might feel QA is not focusing on the most critical areas.
2. The PO may believe that testing is not aligned with user expectations
or requirements.
3. QA could argue that developers are delivering code too late for
thorough testing.
7. Test Cases Demo
Responsible Team Member: QA
Examples:
1. Demonstrating Test Cases - Showcasing the test cases to stakeholders
for feedback.
2. Gathering Feedback - Collecting input on test coverage and accuracy.
3. Updating Test Cases - Revising test cases based on feedback received.
Common Mistakes:
1. Unclear Demonstration - Failing to explain test cases clearly,
leading to misunderstandings.
2. Ignoring Feedback - Not incorporating stakeholder feedback into test
cases.
3. Inadequate Preparation - Not preparing well for the demo, resulting
in a poor presentation.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Stakeholders might feel the test cases do not cover all necessary
scenarios.
2. Developers could argue that the test cases are too detailed and
time-consuming.
3. The PO may believe the demo is not showcasing the most important
aspects of the product.
8. Test Cases Review
Responsible Team Member: Business Analyst (BA)
Examples:
1. Reviewing Test Cases - Ensuring test cases align with user stories
and acceptance criteria.
2. Providing Feedback - Offering suggestions to improve test case
coverage and accuracy.
3. Approving Test Cases - Giving the green light for test cases to be
executed.
Common Mistakes:
1. Superficial Reviews - Conducting reviews without thoroughly checking
for completeness.
2. Delayed Reviews - Providing feedback too late, impacting the testing
timeline.
3. Lack of Detail - Giving vague feedback, not addressing specific
issues.
Points of Disagreement:
1. QA might feel the BA’s feedback is too nitpicky or not practical.
2. Developers could argue that the review process is slowing down the
sprint progress.
3. The PO may believe the BA is not considering the business value in
their reviews.
9. Prepare and Maintain Burn-down
Chart and Velocity
Responsible Team Member: Scrum Master
Examples:
1. Updating Burn-down Chart - Regularly updating the chart to reflect
sprint progress.
2. Tracking Velocity - Monitoring the team's velocity to forecast future
sprints.
3. Identifying Trends - Analyzing data to identify patterns and improve
planning.
Common Mistakes:
1. Inaccurate Updates - Not updating the burn-down chart regularly,
leading to misleading information.
2. Misinterpreting Data - Failing to correctly interpret velocity
trends, impacting future planning.
3. Ignoring Issues - Overlooking trends that indicate potential
problems, such as consistent scope creep.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers might disagree with the accuracy of the burn-down chart.
2. The PO may argue that the velocity data does not reflect true team
capacity due to external factors.
3. The Scrum Master and QA could have different interpretations of what
the data trends indicate.
10. Story Development
Responsible Team Member: Developers
Examples:
1. Implementing Features - Coding features based on user stories and
acceptance criteria.
2. Collaborating with QA - Working with QA to ensure the code meets
quality standards.
3. Unit Testing - Writing and executing unit tests to verify the code.
Common Mistakes:
1. Lack of Collaboration - Developers working in silos, leading to
integration issues.
2. Skipping Unit Tests - Not writing unit tests, resulting in lower code
quality.
3. Ignoring Refactoring - Not refactoring code, leading to technical
debt.
Points of Disagreement:
1. QA might feel developers are not considering testability in their
code.
2. The PO may argue that development is not aligning with user
priorities.
3. Developers could have differing opinions on the best approach to
implement a feature.
11. Unit Testing with Necessary
Artefacts
Responsible Team Member: Developers
Examples:
1. Writing Unit Tests - Developing tests to validate individual units of
code.
2. Documenting Tests - Providing documentation for unit tests and their
expected outcomes.
3. Running Tests - Executing unit tests to ensure code correctness.
Common Mistakes:
1. Insufficient Coverage - Writing unit tests that do not cover all
scenarios.
2. Poor Documentation - Failing to document tests, making it difficult
for others to understand them.
3. Ignoring Failures - Not addressing failing tests promptly, leading to
unresolved issues.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers may disagree on the importance of certain
tests, leading to gaps in coverage.
2. QA might argue that the unit tests are not thorough
enough to ensure quality.
3. The Tech Lead could believe that more time should be
dedicated to writing and maintaining tests, while developers might feel
pressured by deadlines.
12. Code Review
Responsible Team Member: Tech Lead
Examples:
1. Reviewing Code - Checking the code for quality,
standards, and best practices.
2. Providing Feedback - Offering constructive feedback to
improve the code.
3. Approving Merges - Approving code for merging into the
main branch.
Common Mistakes:
1. Superficial Reviews - Conducting quick reviews without
thorough checks.
2. Delaying Reviews - Taking too long to review code,
causing delays in the sprint.
3. Overlooking Standards - Not enforcing coding standards
and best practices.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers might feel that the Tech Lead is being overly
critical or nitpicky.
2. The Tech Lead could argue that the code is not up to the
team's standards, while developers believe it is sufficient.
3. The PO may be concerned that delayed reviews are
impacting delivery timelines.
13. Sprint Review
& Adherence to Sprint Goal/Agile
Responsible Team Member: Scrum Master
Examples:
1. Conducting Sprint Review - Facilitating the sprint review
meeting to showcase completed work.
2. Assessing Sprint Goal - Evaluating whether the sprint
goal was achieved.
3. Gathering Feedback - Collecting feedback from
stakeholders on the sprint outcome.
Common Mistakes:
1. Unstructured Reviews - Conducting reviews without a clear
structure, leading to confusion.
2. Ignoring Feedback - Not considering stakeholder feedback
for future sprints.
3. Inadequate Preparation - Not preparing adequately for the
review meeting.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Stakeholders might disagree with the Scrum Master on the
success of the sprint in meeting the goals.
2. Developers could feel that the feedback does not
accurately reflect their efforts and contributions.
3. The PO may believe that not all necessary feedback is
being captured or addressed.
14. Sprint Demo
Responsible Team Member: Developer
Examples:
1. Demonstrating Features - Showcasing the developed
features to stakeholders.
2. Explaining Functionality - Providing a detailed explanation
of how the features work.
3. Answering Questions - Addressing any questions or
concerns from stakeholders.
Common Mistakes:
1. Poor Presentation - Not presenting features clearly,
causing misunderstandings.
2. Lack of Preparation - Not preparing the demo thoroughly,
leading to a poor presentation.
3. Ignoring Feedback - Not incorporating feedback received
during the demo.
Points of Disagreement:
1. The PO might feel that the demo does not sufficiently
highlight the value of the features.
2. Stakeholders could argue that certain important features
or functionalities were not included in the demo.
3. Developers might feel that the feedback is too critical
or not constructive.
15. QA Test Results
Summary
Responsible Team Member: QA
Examples:
1. Summarizing Test Results - Providing a summary of test
results and defect status.
2. Highlighting Issues - Identifying critical issues that
need to be addressed.
3. Recommending Actions - Suggesting actions based on the
test results.
Common Mistakes:
1. Incomplete Summaries - Not providing comprehensive
summaries, leading to missed issues.
2. Delayed Reporting - Sharing test results too late to take
corrective actions.
3. Ignoring Minor Issues - Overlooking minor issues that
could become significant later.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers might feel QA is focusing too much on minor
issues.
2. The PO could argue that the summary does not provide a
clear enough picture of product readiness.
3. QA might feel their findings are not being taken seriously
by the development team.
16. Requirement
Traceability Matrix
Responsible Team Member: QA
Examples:
1. Creating the Matrix - Developing a matrix that traces
requirements to their corresponding test cases.
2. Updating the Matrix - Keeping the matrix updated as
requirements and test cases evolve.
3. Using the Matrix - Utilizing the matrix to ensure all
requirements are tested.
Common Mistakes:
1. Incomplete Traceability - Not tracing all requirements,
leading to gaps in testing.
2. Poor Maintenance - Failing to update the matrix
regularly, making it unreliable.
3. Overcomplication - Making the matrix too complex, leading
to difficulties in using it effectively.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers might feel the matrix is unnecessary or overly
detailed.
2. The PO could argue that not all business requirements are
being adequately traced.
3. QA might feel that the development team is not providing
enough input to keep the matrix accurate.
17. Sprint
Retrospective
Responsible Team Member: Scrum Master
Examples:
1. Conducting Retrospective - Facilitating the retrospective
meeting to reflect on the sprint.
2. Identifying Improvements - Pinpointing areas for
improvement based on team feedback.
3. Action Planning - Creating action plans to address
identified issues.
Common Mistakes:
1. Superficial Discussions - Having shallow discussions that
do not address core issues.
2. Ignoring Actions - Failing to follow through on action
plans from previous retrospectives.
3. Blame Culture - Allowing the retrospective to become a
blame game rather than a constructive discussion.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Team members might disagree on what went wrong and how to
fix it.
2. The PO could feel that their input is not being
considered seriously.
3. The Scrum Master might believe the team is not open
enough during the retrospective.
18. UAT Testing
Responsible Team Member: Business Analyst (BA)
Examples:
1. Planning UAT - Organizing user acceptance testing with
end-users.
2. Conducting UAT - Overseeing the execution of UAT to
validate the product.
3. Collecting Feedback - Gathering feedback from end-users
on the product.
Common Mistakes:
1. Poor Planning - Not planning UAT thoroughly, leading to
missed critical tests.
2. Incomplete Feedback - Not capturing comprehensive
feedback from end-users.
3. Delayed UAT - Conducting UAT too late, leaving little
time for addressing issues.
Points of Disagreement:
1. The PO might feel the UAT is not comprehensive enough.
2. Developers could argue that the feedback from UAT is too
late to be actionable.
3. End-users might disagree with the BA on the usability or
functionality of the product.
19. UAT Demo
Responsible Team Member: Product Owner (PO)
Examples:
1. Demonstrating to Users - Showcasing the product to
end-users for final approval.
2. Gathering Final Feedback - Collecting final feedback from
users on the product.
3. Making Adjustments - Making any last-minute adjustments
based on user feedback.
Common Mistakes:
1. Inadequate Preparation - Not preparing the demo
thoroughly, leading to a poor presentation.
2. Ignoring Feedback - Not incorporating user feedback into
final adjustments.
3. Miscommunication - Failing to clearly communicate how the
product meets user needs.
Points of Disagreement:
1. End-users might feel their feedback is not being taken
seriously or implemented.
2. The PO could believe that the users are not considering
the broader business context.
3. Developers might argue that the feedback requires
significant changes that are not feasible within the timeline.
20. Sprint Task
Closure
Responsible Team Member: Scrum Master
Examples:
1. Updating Status - Ensuring all sprint tasks are updated
with the appropriate status.
2. Closing Tasks - Officially closing completed tasks in the
sprint management tool.
3. Reviewing Completeness - Verifying that all tasks meet
the definition of done.
Common Mistakes:
1. Incomplete Updates - Not updating all tasks, leading to
confusion about what is done.
2. Premature Closure - Closing tasks that are not fully
completed.
3. Overlooking Details - Missing small details that prevent
tasks from being truly complete.
Points of Disagreement:
1. Developers might feel that some tasks are being closed
prematurely.
2. The PO could argue that certain tasks do not fully meet
the acceptance criteria.
3. The Scrum Master may believe that the team is not
adhering to the definition of done rigorously enough.
Comments
Post a Comment